criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview

criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview

Blog Article

refers to your landmark case decided because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Listed here’s a brief overview:

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a nicely-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.

When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually actually pretty obscure about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the 90-day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID expected) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.

82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we have been obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject into the approval on the competent authority. Read more

This guide offers beneficial insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.

On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf from the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Positions with DCFS.

two. I have read the acquired counsel to the parties and also figured out DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-

Case legislation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation in the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is important for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and selling transparency.

Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done In the event the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were perfectly conscious of the allegations and led the check here evidence therefore this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to get fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)